Exactly 20 years today, Ghana’s Parliament unanimously passed the Criminal Code (Repeal of Criminal Libel and Seditious Laws) (Amendment) Bill.
Seven days later, on August 2, 2001, former President John Agyekum Kufuor gave his assent to the Criminal Code (Repeal of Criminal Libel and Seditious Laws) (Amendment) Act, 2001 (Act 602), a deed that freed journalists from suffering the pain of incarceration for exercising free speech and expression.
The repeal of the law was in fulfilment of a campaign promise made by President Kufuor in the run-up to the 2000 elections with the view to expanding the frontiers of press freedom as guaranteed under the 1992 Constitution, particularly Article 21(1)(a) and Chapter 12.
In the course of time, however, some people had called for the resurrection of the criminal libel law to deal with what they claim to be the recklessness and irresponsibility of the media.
Although the sins of the media may be like scarlet, or as red as crimson, the imperatives of free press to democratic development render their sins as white as snow, for which compelling reasons nobody must disturb the quiet sleep of the criminal libel law in its grave.
“A free press can, of course, be good or bad, but, most certainly without freedom, the press will never be anything but bad,” French journalist Albert Camus had settled the matter decades before the repeal of the criminal libel law in Ghana.
It’s over but not over
The criminal libel and seditious laws imposed custodial sentence on journalists as punishment for their editorial indiscretion, and it is trite knowledge that in democracy, criminalization of free speech is a crime in itself.
So those advocating for the return of the criminal libel law may not succeed in driving us to the past, and the media, standing akimbo in a defiant mode, will continue to say: ‘No abaabase’!
But, perhaps, what the anti-press freedom advocates may succeed in driving us to about the past is that incarceration under the criminal libel regime may be more comforting than the lacerations suffered by journalists from assault in the current dispensation.
As the media in Ghana celebrate two decades of freedom from an obnoxious law that jailed many journalists, they do so not oblivious of the need to be bailed from assault against journalists, a new norm of press freedom attack that may be worse than the criminal libel law.
Interestingly, two of the three arms of government – Executive and Legislature – that acted as collaborators to free the Fourth Estate of the Realm from the old order (criminal libel law) yesterday, are today acting as conspirators to hold the media captive under a new order (assault against journalists).
The Executive
Former President Kufuor took a bold and commendable step to repeal the criminal libel law, and he will forever remain a celebrity in the heart of the media fraternity for undertaking such a worthy cause in 2001.
But what the Executive has given the media thereafter is brutality handed mainly by the police and the military in a manner that would make spending time in jail under the era of the criminal libel law rather comforting.
The cases of Joy FM’s Latif Iddrisu, who was hit on the head by a police officer to the extent of fracturing his skull; Emmanuel Ajarfor Abugri of modermghana.com, who was arrested and tortured by National Security operatives, and Caleb Kudah of Citi FM and Citi TV, who was brutalized by Ministry of National Security assignees, may suffice for a recall of journalists who have suffered inhumane treatment in the past two decades.
What is more disheartening is that the perpetrators were or are supposed to be law enforcers who ought to know the meaning of the rule of law; and in the cases of Ajarfor and Kudah, the ‘law enforcers’ had come directly from the offices of the Ministry of National Security.
The Legislature
Twenty years ago, Parliament unanimously passed the Criminal Code (Repeal of Criminal Libel and Seditious Laws) (Amendment) Bill but thereafter, the House has not only failed, unanimously, to pay the bill of protecting press freedom and independence; it has, rather pathetically, led the assault against press freedom and, in some instances, the person of journalists.
Way back in the 18th Century, Member of Parliament (MP) Edmund Burke, sitting in the House of Commons of the British Parliament, declared the importance of the press in profound terms.
Hear him:
“There are three estates in Parliament but in the Reporters’ Gallery yonder there sits a Fourth Estate more important far than they all. It is not a figure of speech or witty saying, it is a literal fact, very momentous to us in these times.”
Two-and-half centuries later, on February 26, 2020, Speaker of Ghana’s Parliament, Prof Aaron Mike Oquaye, had no such regard for the occupants of the Reporters’ Gallery as Burke did, making his point also in very profound terms.
Hear him:
“I want to let the media know. If that which is reported to have happened should happen again, I have reminded you of the fact that you are here as guests by my permission. Because of the importance this House attaches to the MP profession, any such humiliation will make you an unwelcome guest and your welcome will be duly withdrawn.” (Credit: modernghana.com).
Speaker Oquaye’s anger and threat were because some members of the parliamentary press corps had left the Reporters’ Gallery in pursuit of ‘hot news’ about a parliamentary-related matter inside Parliament House.
As the Akan adage asserts: “If the animal will not bite you, it will not bare its teeth at you”.
But unlike Mike Oquaye, the MP for Assin Central, Kennedy Agyapong, is a businessman; he has no time for foreplay and so he calls on the public to assault journalists anytime he despises one, and nobody can do him ‘foko’!
Indeed, nobody has done him ‘foko’, as he beats his chest boastfully around, a typical exhibit of Parliament’s failure to protect press freedom even from within its ranks.
The Judiciary
In all measure, the Judiciary has not played an active role in ‘murdering’ press freedom as much as the Executive and the Legislature have done.
Indeed, there are many instances where the Judiciary has defended press freedom in the courtroom but they are too little for comfort.
While a headline like: “Court fines Hajia Fati GH¢9,000 for assaulting journalist” may sound victorious, it is not far-reaching enough to warrant the waving of white handkerchief by the media.
Rather, it may strengthen the resolve of the perpetrators to continue to beat the hell out of journalists, knowing very well that the punishment that awaits them is pittance.
That notwithstanding, the Judiciary remains the media’s hope for years to come as far as dealing with attacks against journalists and press freedom are concerned.
Media responsibility
Sometimes, while addressing the enemy and mapping out strategy to deal with him, it is also important to search for the enemy within and deal with him too.
The greatest enemy of the media under the current dispensation is irresponsibility and that must be fought on all fronts.
The more the media exhibits high sense of responsibility, the higher the trust and confidence they would exact from the public, and the strengthening of trust and confidence will, in no doubt, weaken the hands of the assaulters.
As Ghana’s first president Dr Kwame Nkurmah once said: “Internal vigilance is the price for liberty”.
Writer’s Email: kofiyebo@yahoo.com
The writer is the General Secretary of the Ghana Journalists Association (GJA) and Communications lecturer at Wisconsin International University College, Ghana.
